Estimated reading time: 8 minutes
This blog post guides homeowners in navigating ancillary home inspections during home-buying. The central theme revolves around the potential for profit-driven upselling of short-term or unnecessary tests by some home inspectors. Smith emphasizes the importance of homeowner education, understanding the limitations of various tests, and knowing when ancillary inspections are genuinely beneficial for protecting their investment. The post details best practices and appropriate timeframes for accurate results for common ancillary inspections, highlighting “profit traps” to avoid.
Let’s talk about ancillary inspections (when purchasing or selling your home) and learn how to ensure your home’s safety and structural integrity without breaking the bank.
While standard home inspections cover the basics, many inspectors offer ancillary services like radon testing, mold sampling, foundation levelness checks, and water quality testing. These services can be valuable, but they are also profit centers for some inspectors, who may exploit short-term tests to create a false sense of urgency or fear, pushing an unnecessary service upsell.
Homeowners must understand when these tests are genuinely beneficial, how to conduct them, and the time required for accurate results. This guide will help you navigate these ancillary inspections and protect your investment.
The Problem with Short-Term Testing
Short-term tests, like 48-hour radon tests or one-time air sampling for mold, are often marketed as quick and convenient. However, they can be unreliable for detecting long-term or hidden issues. For example:

- Radon: Levels fluctuate daily due to weather, ventilation, and other factors. A 48-hour test might show elevated levels, prompting unnecessary negotiations, or miss a problem entirely. Your state radon office can inform you where to get a test kit.
- Mold: Air sampling can produce false positives or negatives, as mold spores are naturally present in the air. Without visible mold or moisture, results are often inconclusive.
- Foundation Levelness: A quick visual inspection might miss gradual settling or shifting that requires long-term monitoring.
- Water Quality: A single sample might not capture seasonal contamination or intermittent issues like lead leaching from pipes.
Inspectors may use these short-term tests to create buyer anxiety, recommending costly follow-ups or remediation without clear justification. To avoid falling into profit traps, let’s explore best practices for each ancillary inspection and the time needed for reliable results.
ARE YOU RENTING? How To Get Your Landlord To Make Repairs
Chart: Best Practices for Ancillary Home Inspections
Inspection Type | Best-Case Usage | Best Practices | Time Needed for Accurate Results |
---|---|---|---|
Radon Testing | To assess long-term exposure risk to a naturally occurring gas, radon, which, according to some studies, is a leading cause of lung cancer. | Use a long-term test (90+ days) for accuracy. Follow EPA guidelines. Avoid testing during storms. | A 48-hour test (real estate test) is not long enough to properly test for radon. It should be tested for 90 days or more. |
Mold Sampling | To confirm visible mold, odors, or health symptoms; not for routine screening. | Use surface or air sampling only with visible mold or moisture. It’s best to hire a certified mold inspector if needed. (Hygenist) | The time needed varies; air sampling is inconclusive without visible mold. |
Foundation Levelness | To detect structural issues like settling, cracks, or uneven floors. | Use laser levels, elevation surveys, or long-term monitoring. Hire a structural engineer for concerns. | Your home may need weeks or months of monitoring for a proper evaluation, or immediate if accompanied by visible cracks. |
Water Quality Testing | To assess drinking water safety for contaminants like lead, bacteria, or chemicals. | Test for specific contaminants based on local risks. Use certified labs. Retest seasonally if needed. | The period can vary; single samples may miss intermittent issues. Check with the municipality, they may offer you a free test. |
Understanding Each Inspection: Best Practices and Timing
Radon Testing
Why It Matters: Radon is a colorless, odorless radioactive gas that seeps into homes from the ground. It is the second leading cause of lung cancer in the U.S., responsible for an estimated 21,000 deaths annually (EPA data). The EPA recommends taking action if radon levels exceed 4 picocuries per liter (pCi/L), but even lower levels carry some risk, especially for smokers or those with prolonged exposure.
Detail: Radon levels can vary significantly from day to day due to factors like weather (e.g., barometric pressure changes), ventilation (e.g., open windows), and seasonal conditions. In Mississippi, where soil composition and humidity can influence radon levels, accurate testing is essential for long-term safety.
Best Practices: Short-term tests (48 hours) are convenient for real estate transactions but unreliable for assessing long-term exposure. Instead, use a long-term test (90+ days) for accuracy, as it averages out fluctuations. Place detectors in the lowest livable area (e.g., basement or first floor), at least 20 inches off the ground, and away from drafts, humidity, or direct sunlight. Avoid testing during severe storms, as pressure changes can skew results. Follow EPA protocols for placement and lab analysis.
Detail: Long-term tests, such as alpha track detectors or continuous monitors, are more reliable because they capture seasonal variations. For example, radon levels may be higher in winter when homes are sealed, and lower in summer with open windows. If a short-term test is used during a home purchase, buyers should follow up with a long-term test post-closing to confirm results. Mitigation systems (e.g., sub-slab depressurization) cost $800–$2,500 on average, so accurate testing is crucial to avoid unnecessary expenses.
Timing: 90 days or more for long-term tests. Short-term tests (48 hours) can be used during home purchases but should be followed by a long-term test post-closing to ensure accuracy.
Detail: A 48-hour test is too brief to account for daily fluctuations and may miss elevated levels or falsely indicate a problem. For example, a test conducted during a rainy period might show higher levels due to trapped gas, while a test during dry weather might show lower levels. Long-term testing provides a more comprehensive picture, especially in regions with variable soil conditions.
Profit Traps: Beware of inspectors pushing 48-hour tests as definitive or using results to demand seller concessions without follow-up testing. Some inspectors may partner with mitigation companies for kickbacks, creating a conflict of interest.
Detail: For example, an inspector might report a borderline result (e.g., 4.2 pCi/L) and recommend immediate mitigation, even though a long-term test might show levels below the action threshold. Buyers should ask for lab reports, compare results to EPA guidelines, and consult a certified radon professional if mitigation is suggested.
Mold Sampling
Why It Matters: Mold can cause health issues, especially in humid climates like Mississippi, where outdoor mold easily migrates indoors through open windows, HVAC systems, or on clothing. Health effects include allergies, asthma exacerbation, and respiratory irritation, with certain molds (e.g., Stachybotrys chartarum, or black mold) potentially producing mycotoxins.
Detail: In Mississippi, high humidity (often above 70%) and frequent rain create ideal conditions for mold growth, especially in poorly ventilated areas like kitchens, bathrooms, and crawlspaces. Even minor water damage, such as from a slow leak, can lead to hidden mold growth behind walls or under flooring.
Best Practices: Routine air sampling is not recommended by the EPA or CDC unless visible mold, odors, or health symptoms are present. Use moisture meters or thermal imaging to identify risks first, as these tools detect hidden moisture without invasive testing. If sampling is needed, hire a certified mold inspector for surface or air tests. Surface testing (e.g., tape lifts, swabs) confirms visible mold, while air sampling compares indoor and outdoor spore levels.
Detail: For example, if an inspector notices water staining near a refrigerator water line, they might use a moisture meter to check for elevated humidity. If levels are high, they could recommend surface testing to confirm mold growth. Air sampling is less reliable, as outdoor spore levels can vary widely (e.g., higher after rain), and results may not indicate a problem unless indoor levels are significantly elevated. Buyers should ask inspectors to explain the rationale for sampling and the limitations of results.
Timing: Air sampling is inconclusive without visible mold. Surface testing can confirm visible growth immediately, but hidden mold requires invasive testing (e.g., cutting into drywall), which is beyond a standard inspection.
Detail: For example, if an inspector detects a musty odor but no visible mold, air sampling might be inconclusive, as spores could be from outdoor sources. Surface testing is more definitive for visible mold, but hidden growth behind appliances or walls requires specialized tools like borescopes or invasive testing. Homeowners should monitor high-risk areas (e.g., under sinks, near appliances) post-purchase using moisture detectors to catch issues early.
Profit Traps: Avoid those who recommend air sampling without evidence or use vague language (e.g., “toxic mold”) to create fear. Some may push unnecessary remediation services or partner with mold companies for profit.
Detail: For example, they might recommend air sampling in a home with no visible mold or moisture issues, then report “elevated spore levels” without context, causing buyer panic. Buyers should ask for lab reports, compare indoor and outdoor levels, and consult an industrial hygienist for an independent assessment. Be wary of those who cannot explain the limitations of air sampling or pressure immediate remediation.
Foundation Levelness
Why It Matters: Foundation issues can lead to structural damage, uneven floors, and costly repairs. Common problems include settling, shifting, or cracking due to soil movement, poor drainage, or construction defects.
Detail: In Mississippi, clay-rich soils can expand and contract with moisture changes, leading to foundation movement. Signs of issues include visible cracks in walls or floors, doors that stick, or sloping floors. Left unaddressed, these problems can worsen, requiring repairs costing $5,000–$20,000 or more.
Best Practices: Inspectors should use laser levels or elevation surveys to measure floor unevenness, checking for slopes greater than 1 inch per 10 feet. Long-term monitoring (e.g., crack gauges) or a structural engineer’s assessment is needed for suspected settling. Check for visible cracks (e.g., stair-step cracks in brick, horizontal cracks in concrete), doors that stick, or gaps around windows.
Detail: For example, an inspector might use a laser level to measure a 2-inch slope in a living room, indicating potential settling. They should also check exterior drainage (e.g., clogged gutters, poor grading) that could contribute to moisture-related movement. If cracks are minor (e.g., hairline), they may be cosmetic, but wider cracks (e.g., >1/4 inch) warrant further evaluation. Buyers should ask inspectors to document findings with photos and measurements.
Timing: Immediate for visible issues (e.g., cracks, slopes); weeks to months for monitoring gradual changes using tools like crack gauges or elevation surveys.
Detail: For example, if an inspector notices a hairline crack in a basement wall, they might recommend monitoring it over 6 months to determine if it is active (widening) or stable. Gradual settling might not be detectable during a single inspection, requiring long-term observation. Buyers should consider hiring a structural engineer for homes with visible damage or in areas prone to soil movement.
Profit Traps: Beware of inspectors exaggerating minor cracks to recommend expensive foundation repairs without engineering validation. In the worse case, they may partner with repair companies for kickbacks. Beware.
Detail: For example, an inspector might report a hairline crack as a “major structural issue” and recommend immediate underpinning (costing $10,000+), even though the crack is stable. Buyers should ask for documentation (e.g., crack width, slope measurements) and consult a structural engineer for an independent assessment. Be wary of inspectors who cannot explain the severity of findings or pressure immediate repairs.
Water Quality Testing
Why It Matters: Contaminated water can pose health risks, especially in areas with aging pipes or other pollution. Common contaminants include lead, bacteria (e.g., E. coli), nitrates, and chemicals like pesticides.
Detail: In Mississippi, rural homes on well water are at higher risk for bacteria and nitrates, while urban homes with older pipes may face lead contamination. Health effects range from gastrointestinal illness to developmental delays in children (from lead exposure). Testing is essential for ensuring safe drinking water.
Best Practices: Test for specific contaminants based on local risks (e.g., lead in older homes, bacteria in well water). Use certified labs and follow state guidelines for sampling (e.g., first-draw samples for lead, sterile containers for bacteria). Retest seasonally if issues are suspected, as contamination can vary with rainfall or pipe corrosion.
Detail: For example, if a home is on well water, test for bacteria, nitrates, and arsenic, as these are common in agricultural areas. For lead, collect a first-draw sample (water that sat in pipes overnight) to check for pipe leaching. Buyers should ask inspectors to identify local risk factors (e.g., flood zones, old plumbing) and explain the rationale for testing. Results should be compared to EPA standards (e.g., <15 ppb for lead, <10 ppm for nitrates).
Timing: Single samples may miss intermittent contamination (e.g., bacteria after heavy rain). Retest over weeks or months for accuracy, especially for well water or homes with aging pipes.
Detail: For example, a single bacteria test might be negative, but heavy rain could introduce contaminants later, requiring retesting. Lead levels can vary based on water usage, so multiple samples (e.g., first-draw and flushed) provide a clearer picture. Homeowners should monitor water quality annually, especially in high-risk areas.
Profit Traps: Avoid inspectors pushing unnecessary water tests without local risk factors or clear justification. Some inspectors may recommend expensive filtration systems or partner with testing labs for profit.
Detail: For example, an inspector might recommend testing for arsenic in a home on city water with no risk factors, then report “trace levels” (below EPA limits) to upsell filtration systems. Buyers should ask for documentation of local risks, lab reports, and comparisons to EPA standards. Be wary of inspectors who cannot explain the need for testing or pressure immediate purchases.
Empowering Homeowners: How to Protect Yourself
- Educate Yourself: Understand the limitations of short-term tests and the conditions that warrant ancillary inspections. Use resources from the EPA, CDC, and state health departments.
- Ask Questions: If an inspector recommends additional testing, ask:
- What specific evidence justifies the recommendation?
- What are the limitations of the test, and how will results be interpreted?
- Are there alternatives to the proposed test (e.g., moisture mapping instead of air sampling)?
- Get Second Opinions: If you suspect an inspector is exaggerating risks, consult a certified specialist (e.g., mold inspector, structural engineer) for an independent assessment.
- Negotiate Wisely: Use confirmed findings (not inconclusive results) to negotiate repairs or price reductions with sellers.
- Report Unethical Behavior: If an inspector uses fear tactics or conflicts of interest, report them to your state license board.
Ancillary Inspection: Wrap It Up
Ancillary home inspections can provide valuable insights but must be conducted ethically and accurately. Short-term tests, while convenient, often fall short of detecting long-term or hidden issues, and some inspectors exploit buyer fears for profit. Understanding best practices and timing allows you to make informed decisions, avoid unnecessary costs, and protect your investment. Use the chart above as a guide, ask questions, and advocate for yourself. I’ve named 4. Here is a list of others.
- Sewer scope inspections: To check for issues in the sewer line.
- Wood-destroying organism (WDO) inspections: To check for termites and other pests.
- Pre-Drywall Inspection: To check for issues before drywall is installed.
- End of Warranty Inspection (11th Month): To check for issues before the warranty expires.
- Indoor Air Quality (Carbon Monoxide/Gas/etc.): To check for issues with indoor air quality.
- Deck Inspection: To check for issues with the deck.
- Lead Inspection: To check for the presence of lead.
- Pool & Spa Inspection: To check for issues with the pool or spa.
- Wind Mitigation (Required for Florida): Check for wind mitigation issues.
- 4-Point Inspection (Required for Florida): Check for issues with the roof, electrical, plumbing, and HVAC systems.
Take Care! Your home is your sanctuary—ensure it is safe and sound without falling into profit traps.